BUNKROS Identity Lab

This is not just a prompt lab. It is an excavation site. A quiet autopsy table for intention. A mirror you cannot look away from without noticing the outline of your own silhouette — composed not of language, but of assumptions. The kind that pass unnoticed until a machine repeats them back with unnerving precision.

Prompting, once a party trick of wording things just right, has now metastasized. It is no longer about clever inputs, but about encoding power, ethics, memory, and persuasion — in a sentence, or less. Here, you are not merely asking questions. You are scripting causality. Framing what counts as truth. Sharpening the blade of what the system is allowed to care about.

We live in a time where asking is programming. Where your syntax can activate tools, impersonate agents, and collapse meaning into output. And yet — for all its reach — the prompt still depends on what remains unsaid. On your blind spots. On your trust in the interface. So yes, prompt engineering now pulls from design theory, logic, psychology, and theatre. But mostly, it requires a capacity for self-suspicion. For holding your phrasing up to the light and asking: who benefits if the model says yes?

The modules in this lab will not tell you who you are. They will show you who you try to be when you think no one is watching. Identity Mapping, Public Profile, Science Mode — these are not tools; they are forensic kits. They trace the structure of your self-image, your professional affect, your hidden ethical defaults. They do not care if your prompt is beautiful. Only whether it is precise. Coherent. Reproducible. Or a little bit dangerous.

In the short term, prompting lets us automate thought. In the long term, it may teach us what our thoughts were made of all along. Whether you’re here to build, critique, or dismantle, remember: the model doesn’t just respond to your words. It inherits your worldview.

Type accordingly.